Repository navigation
docs: correct interruption-study return time - #9
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The interruption entry presented the popular 23-minute figure as the overall return-time estimate in the 2005 observation. The paper's same-day mean is 25 minutes 26 seconds, with SD 54 minutes 48 seconds; the analysis excludes interruptions in the final work hour. It does not measure time needed to refocus.
This corrects the bilingual evidence, caveats, headline hooks and boss lines, regenerates the README/chapter/Skill outputs and updates the two sharing cards. The myth claim remains unsupported, Grade B. The registered abstract quote remains “24 information workers”; the body-text figure is not represented as an abstract check. Primary paper, printed p.326 / PDF page6.
Validation: data checks and generated-file checks pass; reader builds; both PNGs were visually checked. Counts remain 58 claims, 125 sources, 9 chapters, grades 0/26/32. Twenty other cards retain their original bytes. Two read-only reviewers checked the correction against the source. This does not constitute expert review of every source.
The published v0.1.0 tag and release assets are untouched. Main's reader and repository content will reflect this correction after merge. AI-assisted editing with source verification.