Skip to content

fix: demo honesty pass (real targets, honest labels, documented live_verified blocker) - #6

Merged
wjlgatech merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/demos-honesty-fixes
Jun 15, 2026
Merged

wjlgatech merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/demos-honesty-fixes

Conversation

@wjlgatech

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Acts on the honest review of the 10 demos.

(a) Honest labels — relabel so the domain matches the real target: smart-grid → Weather & forecasting (Open-Meteo is weather, not grid control), supply-chain → Aviation tracking (OpenSky is flights, not freight). The grand grid-dispatch / logistics-reroute loops stay as recipes.

(b) Real codebase targets — vendored services/example-microservice (stdlib service) and services/example-curriculum (lessons+quiz lib). software-arch/edu-curriculum pointed at non-existent placeholder paths; now the targets exist and a test asserts it.

(c) No faked verified result — both generators (CLI-Printing-Press, CLI-Anything) are Claude Code skills driven by claude -p, which is quota-blocked until 2026-07-01, so a genuine engine-generated live_verified is impossible today. Rather than fabricate one, demos/README.md documents why all 10 stay illustrative. Also removed a decorative blocked_safety status from supply-chain (badge coverage moved to a synthetic generator test).

107 tests pass.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

… status

- relabel smart-grid -> Weather & forecasting, supply-chain -> Aviation tracking
  (domain matches the real Open-Meteo/OpenSky targets; grand loops stay recipes)
- vendor real services/example-microservice + services/example-curriculum
  (codebase targets were placeholder paths)
- drop fabricated blocked_safety on supply-chain; badge coverage -> synthetic test
- demos/README.md: all demos illustrative; why none are live_verified
  (both generators are claude -p skills, quota-blocked until 2026-07-01)
@wjlgatech
wjlgatech merged commit 0c90d7d into main Jun 15, 2026
4 checks passed
@wjlgatech
wjlgatech deleted the feat/demos-honesty-fixes branch June 15, 2026 19:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant