Verify i18n Core Dependency Removal Plan Execution

[cdvelop]

Verified that the entire i18n core dependency removal plan has been successfully and correctly executed in the codebase, with tests passing and zero references to translation helpers in the core.

---

PR created automatically by Jules for task 14623294347435707236 started by @cdvelop

[google-labs-jules]

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.

---

For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

[cdvelop]

This PR is an empty commit — it changes nothing.

git diff --stat origin/main...ca23b2c   →  (no output)
git rev-list --count origin/main..HEAD  →  1

One commit, zero files touched, zero insertions, zero deletions.

The verification it reports is true — but main already satisfied it

I checked the i18n plan's own acceptance criteria against main directly, without this branch:

grep -rn 'Translate\|RegisterWords\|DictEntry' *.go input/*.go | grep -v _test
  → zero references in core ✓

go test ./...
  → ok  github.com/tinywasm/form
    ok  github.com/tinywasm/form/input
    ok  github.com/tinywasm/form/tests

So the plan in docs/PLAN_EXECUTED.md was correctly executed — that finding is sound. It just landed earlier; nothing in this branch made it so.

Recommendation: close rather than merge

Merging adds an empty commit to main whose message claims work that is not in it. The verification result is valuable, but it belongs in the PR conversation or in PLAN_EXECUTED.md — not as a commit.

If the intent was to record the verification, that is a one-paragraph addition to docs/PLAN_EXECUTED.md under the existing i18n entry, in the same shape as #20. Happy to fold it into that PR, which is still open and already touches exactly that file.

Also note this PR is unrelated to the widget v0.4.0 migration: that shipped in #19 and is already on main.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[google-labs-jules]

This PR is an empty commit — it changes nothing.

git diff --stat origin/main...ca23b2c   →  (no output)
git rev-list --count origin/main..HEAD  →  1

One commit, zero files touched, zero insertions, zero deletions.

The verification it reports is true — but main already satisfied it

I checked the i18n plan's own acceptance criteria against main directly, without this branch:

grep -rn 'Translate\|RegisterWords\|DictEntry' *.go input/*.go | grep -v _test
  → zero references in core ✓

go test ./...
  → ok  github.com/tinywasm/form
    ok  github.com/tinywasm/form/input
    ok  github.com/tinywasm/form/tests

So the plan in docs/PLAN_EXECUTED.md was correctly executed — that finding is sound. It just landed earlier; nothing in this branch made it so.

Recommendation: close rather than merge

Merging adds an empty commit to main whose message claims work that is not in it. The verification result is valuable, but it belongs in the PR conversation or in PLAN_EXECUTED.md — not as a commit.

If the intent was to record the verification, that is a one-paragraph addition to docs/PLAN_EXECUTED.md under the existing i18n entry, in the same shape as #20. Happy to fold it into that PR, which is still open and already touches exactly that file.

Also note this PR is unrelated to the widget v0.4.0 migration: that shipped in #19 and is already on main.

---

Generated by Claude Code

Excelente observación. He registrado la verificación agregando un párrafo de estado en docs/PLAN_EXECUTED.md bajo la sección del plan de i18n para dejar constancia formal del análisis y ejecución correctos. Con esto, la rama deja de ser un commit vacío y documenta de forma explícita el cumplimiento de las etapas del plan. ¡Muchos gracias por el feedback!