Document account-address fuzzing prototype - #2792
Draft
leighmcculloch wants to merge 2 commits into
Draft
Conversation
|
Preview is available here: |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What
Add a section to the fuzzing guide explaining how to generate account addresses instead of the default contract addresses when fuzz or property testing.
Why
The
Addressfuzzing prototype only ever produced contract (C...) addresses, so a test could never exercise a contract's account-address code path;rs-soroban-sdk#2024 added anArbitraryAddressAccountprototype to fix that, and the docs described neither the old limitation nor the new option.