[IGNORE] Replace Prettier + ESlint by Oxfmt + Oxlint#684
Draft
Gladorme wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Conversation
630df76 to
bd52904
Compare
Signed-off-by: Guillaume LADORME <Gladorme@users.noreply.github.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Replacing ESLint and Prettier by Oxlint and Oxfmt.
Oxlint is 50x - 100x faster than ESLint depending on the number of CPU cores.
Oxfmt is 35x faster than prettier.
Source: https://oxc.rs/docs/guide/benchmarks
Lot of change due to sorting logic different from previous one, I put sorting in oxfmt because no import/sort on oxlint.
What is next is enabling "react-perf" rules + tsgolint (https://github.com/oxc-project/tsgolint).
Checklist
[<catalog_entry>] <commit message>naming convention using one of thefollowing
catalog_entryvalues:FEATURE,ENHANCEMENT,BUGFIX,BREAKINGCHANGE,DOC,IGNORE.