Gemini Models

[sepandhaghighi]

Reference Issues/PRs

What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes

• Google models updated

Any other comments?

References:

1. https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/models

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 98.69%. Comparing base (b997e8b) to head (3fc2a9b).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev     #261      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   98.69%   98.69%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          12       12              
  Lines        2051     2059       +8     
  Branches      201      201              
==========================================
+ Hits         2024     2032       +8     
  Misses          6        6              
  Partials       21       21              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[codacy-production]

Up to standards ✅

🟢 Issues 0 issues

Results:
0 new issues

View in Codacy

🟢 Metrics 0 complexity · 0 duplication

Metric	Results
Complexity	0
Duplication	0

View in Codacy

_{NEW Get contextual insights on your PRs based on Codacy's metrics, along with PR and Jira context, without leaving GitHub. Enable AI reviewer
TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.}

[sepandhaghighi]

@sadrasabouri

I want to note that I have removed the -preview extension from some Gemini model names.

[sadrasabouri]

I checked them and they look good to me!