Skip to content

docs: document handoff's flags (SM-1) - #361

Merged
arzafran merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/handoff-flags
Aug 4, 2026
Merged

arzafran merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/handoff-flags

Conversation

@arzafran

@arzafran arzafran commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

handoff's --dry-run and --force were discoverable only by reading the script; the README Scripts line now names them. --verbose/--help are parsed but unused, so they are deliberately not documented.

Process-audit docs finding. Test plan: oxfmt clean on touched files, link targets verified, full check green on the branch set.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings August 4, 2026 20:57
@arzafran
arzafran merged commit b17d4c2 into main Aug 4, 2026
3 checks passed
@vercel

vercel Bot commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
satus Ready Ready Preview Aug 4, 2026 8:57pm

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR improves developer-facing documentation by making the handoff script’s key operational flags discoverable directly from the README’s Scripts list, instead of requiring readers to inspect the script implementation.

Changes:

  • Updated the bun run handoff entry in README.md to explicitly list supported flags: --dry-run and --force.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@arzafran
arzafran deleted the docs/handoff-flags branch August 26, 2026 17:08

This branch was successfully deployed

1 active deployment
Preview 97c5d1f7 Deployed Aug 4, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants