Skip to content

ci: Update CodSpeedHQ/action action to v5.4.2 - #1830

Merged
carl-baillargeon merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/codspeedhq-action-5.x
Oct 20, 2026
Merged

carl-baillargeon merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/codspeedhq-action-5.x

Conversation

@renovate

@renovate renovate Bot commented Oct 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change Pending
CodSpeedHQ/action action patch v5.4.0 → v5.4.2 v5.5.0

Release Notes

CodSpeedHQ/action

v5.4.2

Compare Source

Bumps the CodSpeed runner to v5.4.2, including v5.4.1.

This release improves and adds support for memory flamegraphs in C++, Python and Node.js.

Fixes flamegraphs for Python in simulation mode in the exec CLI.

🚀 Features
  • Name Python and Node.js frames in memory flamegraphs: emit their perf maps in memory mode, and harvest perf maps and JIT unwind data for memory tracking, by @​not-matthias in #​556
  • Launch node with the codspeed-node V8 flags for the current mode in codspeed exec, including through npm, npx and #!/usr/bin/env node scripts, by @​not-matthias in #​556
🐛 Bug Fixes
  • Always set PYTHONPERFSUPPORT, so Python codspeed exec targets keep their Python frames in simulation-mode flamegraphs, by @​not-matthias in #​577
  • Fix memory flamegraph stacks: restore return addresses hijacked by uretprobes in nested allocator calls, compare mapped modules against their mapping, and keep every placement of a module mapped more than once, by @​not-matthias in #​564, #​563 and #​556
  • Only pass --interpreted-frames-native-stack to node in analysis mode by @​not-matthias in #​556
  • Label dropped benchmarks in the comparison table by @​adriencaccia in #​570
⚙️ Internals

Full Runner Changelog:
https://github.com/CodSpeedHQ/codspeed/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md

What's Changed

Full Changelog: CodSpeedHQ/action@v5.4.0...v5.4.2


Configuration

📅 Schedule: (in timezone UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • At any time (no schedule defined)
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate Bot added the CI label Oct 16, 2026
@renovate
renovate Bot requested a review from a team October 16, 2026 18:14
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 16, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration
  • Configuration used: defaults
  • Review profile: CHILL
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: 2fb21690-5f4d-4829-b829-520374fc0f81

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@codspeed

codspeed Bot commented Oct 16, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Merging this PR will not alter performance

ℹ️ 6 benchmarks have no flame graph

The flamegraph could not be generated because we failed to resolve the symbols in the profiling trace. This happens when we fail to harvest information about language frames.

✅ 34 untouched benchmarks


Comparing renovate/codspeedhq-action-5.x (16efb65) with main (20ba46d)

Open in CodSpeed

@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/codspeedhq-action-5.x branch from 902b8cb to 16efb65 Compare October 20, 2026 11:48
@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@carl-baillargeon
carl-baillargeon merged commit 1fe7956 into main Oct 20, 2026
23 checks passed
@carl-baillargeon
carl-baillargeon deleted the renovate/codspeedhq-action-5.x branch October 20, 2026 18:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant