Skip to content

Release AxeDGB 0.9.180-dev with memory protection and offline setup - #44

Merged
WillItMod merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/axedgb-memory-0.9.180
Sep 14, 2026
Merged

WillItMod merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/axedgb-memory-0.9.180

Conversation

@WillItMod

@WillItMod WillItMod commented Sep 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Release AxeDGB 0.9.180-dev with actual Core memory measurements, a configurable graceful memory guard, explicit resume after failures, and setup tools bundled into the init image. This removes the Alpine repository dependency that prevented fresh installations from creating Miningcore tables.

The update refreshes the persistent node launcher, retains Core 9.26.5 and existing chain data, reports setup failures, and creates a fresh schema in one transaction. The memory guard is a soft shutdown budget, not an instantaneous allocation cap or a reduction in Core's block-index footprint.

Validation: 33 application/API/supervisor tests and three packaging tests passed. Offline fresh initialization, real Core regtest restart/resume with three preserved blocks, a sustained-memory clean shutdown, and browser settings/resume behaviour were tested in isolation. The published images also passed the regtest API/memory smoke check and existing-database initialization.

All three images at 0.9.180-dev are published for amd64 and arm64 and were pulled without registry credentials:

  • axedgb-app: sha256:db522c398272a4b8aaae2b1a6efb1ca16b2c4511378ddda530f4ef94151fbf4e
  • axedgb-core: sha256:9234f732db4a23d6fc02fcbb00b87c23e1185b9f83a837fe593945e8fe53a662
  • axedgb-init: sha256:5589b659a244a472becf8b74017cd1aef64c1fc68ed5a62d5e320f653b888b45

Application change · Multiarch build

Keep the main channel unchanged until affected mainnet installations have been soak tested. This release does not require a blockchain purge or reindex.

@WillItMod
WillItMod marked this pull request as ready for review September 14, 2026 14:47
@WillItMod
WillItMod merged commit 1976d59 into main Sep 14, 2026
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant