Fix coverage regression for Statement::RowIterator - #562
Merged
Conversation
Add unit tests for Statement::RowIterator operator++(int) and operator== that were not covered by the range-based for loop tests in PR #545.
|
coverage: 99.699% (+0.5%) from 99.248% — fix-statement-iterator-coverage into master |
SRombauts
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 24, 2026
Generated by Mistral Vibe. Co-Authored-By: Mistral Vibe <vibe@mistral.ai>
- Emphasize that CHANGELOG updates must be in a separate commit - Add explicit workflow steps for when to update CHANGELOG - Clarify that PR number must be known before committing CHANGELOG
SRombauts
force-pushed
the
fix-statement-iterator-coverage
branch
from
July 24, 2026 19:58
89eca69 to
b9a400f
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add unit tests for Statement::RowIterator operator++(int) and operator== that were not covered by the range-based for loop tests in PR #545.