Add SDLPoP Wii

[OiJorgeLucas]

• Have you checked that there aren't other open pull requests for the same manifest update/change?
• Have you verified that the manifest contains valid JSON?
• Are you certain that this manifest is not designed to obtain copyrighted material or software, which you do not have permission to distribute?
• Submitting malicious software is strictly forbidden, and potentially constitutes criminal activity, punishable by law. To the best of your knowledge, is this submission clear of any malicious intent?

Adds SDLPoP Wii 1.0, a Nintendo Wii port of SDLPoP.

The Wii port is based on the open-source SDLPoP project by Dávid Nagy and contributors. The release package is hosted on GitHub Releases and already follows the standard Homebrew Channel layout at apps/sdlpop/.

The package is derived from the files distributed by the upstream SDLPoP project together with the Wii-specific port changes, and does not download or obtain any external commercial game files.

Project repository:
https://github.com/OiJorgeLucas/SDLPoP-Wii

WiiBrew page:
https://wiibrew.org/wiki/SDLPoP_Wii

Upstream SDLPoP:
https://github.com/NagyD/SDLPoP

[Aeplet]

Hello, sorry for the delay! This will be reviewed tomorrow.

[Aeplet]

Ismael Cardoso, my cousin, for introducing me to AI tools and teaching me how to use them to accelerate my learning and development process. His guidance made this port possible much sooner than it otherwise would have been.

I am not against AI, but having AI make the whole app is discouraged.

[OiJorgeLucas]

@Aeplet No problem about the delay! I think there was just a misunderstanding: AI did not make the app. I did. :) I’m a Systems Analyst with 8+ years of development experience, and I studied the Wii architecture specifically for this port. I used AI as a support tool, but I made the technical decisions, implemented and tested the port, and I can explain any line of code or design choice in it.

My LinkedIn profile: https://www.linkedin.com/in/oijorgelucas/

If there’s a specific technical issue or repository rule I’m missing, I’m happy to address it. Otherwise, I’d appreciate it if the PR could be reconsidered on its technical merits.