-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 512
catalog: convert the sink builtin tables to materialized views (SQL-493) #38049
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
mtabebe
merged 2 commits into
MaterializeInc:main
from
mtabebe:ma/convert-builtins/sql-493-sink-tables
Aug 13, 2026
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These three conversions also need entries in
misc/python/materialize/checks/all_checks/builtin_version_pin.py:_STABLE_BUILTINSmaps each stablemz_catalogbuiltin to the version that converted it to a view, andmz_sinks,mz_kafka_sinksandmz_iceberg_sinkscurrently sit atNonethere. The file's comment asks for this at conversion time, and #37465 recordedmz_kafka_sourcesin the conversion PR itself. Could you set all three to the version these steps end up at (currently that would bev26.38.0), keeping the two in lockstep?Note nothing goes red when this is missed: every reader on current upgrade paths carries the #37610 tolerance fix (>= v26.35), so a
Noneentry just keeps the check pinning through the conversion and passing. It only shows up by reading, which is presumably how #37725's tables got missed too:mz_kafka_connections,mz_ssh_tunnel_connectionsandmz_aws_privatelink_connectionsare stillNoneon main despite converting in released v26.37.0, andmz_aws_connectionsis absent from the dict entirely (it was a stablemz_catalogtable when the dict was seeded, so it looks like an oversight). Feel free to fold the backfill in here: those four would bev26.37.0.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good catch.
I left mz_aws_connections out, though. It's in mz_internal, not mz_catalog, and it was mz_internal even as a table before #37725, so I don't think it was ever a seeded mz_catalog entry.
The script builds CREATE VIEW ... FROM mz_catalog so it isn't safe to go in.