This reminds me that the list of keywords in the citation files (this one and .zenodo.json) is perhaps worth re-thinking. If these are the keywords that govern when this repo shows for a keyword being searched, several of the keywords seems too generic for expecting this repo to be an appropriate member in set of matches. For example, I'd say it's questionable whether this repo should show up when someone searches for "data", "demos", or "models.
Adding "demos" here doesn't really change the nature of the keywords (if they're too general, they already were so; if they were reasonably good, this should not change that), so may as well be part of the change set. But maybe worth discussing as a separate issue.
Originally posted by @hlapp in #132 (comment)
This reminds me that the list of keywords in the citation files (this one and .zenodo.json) is perhaps worth re-thinking. If these are the keywords that govern when this repo shows for a keyword being searched, several of the keywords seems too generic for expecting this repo to be an appropriate member in set of matches. For example, I'd say it's questionable whether this repo should show up when someone searches for "data", "demos", or "models.
Adding "demos" here doesn't really change the nature of the keywords (if they're too general, they already were so; if they were reasonably good, this should not change that), so may as well be part of the change set. But maybe worth discussing as a separate issue.
Originally posted by @hlapp in #132 (comment)