Repository navigation
Conversation
Analysis of origin/master at d2317de: per layer cost, the tier selector routing most diffs to DEEP, safe changes S1 to S14, and A/B candidates A0 to A9. The findings are unedited. A dated note at the top records that PR #60 fixes four of the gate defects in section 4. The two read-only helper scripts behind the COUNTED numbers are committed verbatim beside the report so those numbers can be re-measured. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What and why
Adds
docs/reports/2026-10-10-cca-performance-report.md, an analysis oforigin/masteratd2317de(release 0.10.1): what each pipeline layer costs, what evidence exists for its value, the tier selector routing most diffs to DEEP (44 of the last 60 commits here), safe changes S1 to S14, and A/B candidates A0 to A9, each with a falsifiable prediction.The findings are unedited. A note dated 2026-10-11 at the top records that #60 fixes four of the gate defects in section 4 (close checks nothing,
--status n/apasses, stale verdicts after REVISE,no-fixruns never close), and that they stay true of master until it merges.The two read-only helper scripts behind the COUNTED numbers (
count.sh,tier_replay.py) are committed verbatim beside the report. They lived only in a session scratchpad, which would have left those numbers unreproducible. Both readorigin/master, so a re-run measures the branch as it is then; the note says to substitute the sha.Checklist
pytest -q: not run. The PR touches no code undercca_checksortests.ruff check cca_checks testsis clean.tier_replay.pyitself has four style findings (three E501, one E741); I left them, since the script is committed as the evidence that produced the numbers and CI does not lintdocs/.🤖 Generated with Claude Code