Again support for alternative HM-MOD UART for HMMOD-UART-CP2102 #3877
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
|
No interest in "beeing open" ? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Moved this to the discussion fora where IMHO it belongs. regarding your request/idea in potentially opening up OpenCCU for other third party RF modules. I am actually all for it and support that - as long as this hardware is released as open hardware itself or at least being distributed non-commercially. Beside that there shouldn‘t be an blocking or other reason why other rf module might not be supported. Apart from technical reasons that require generic raw uart being adapted to that type of hardware to ensure the communication to these devices uses a low level low latency uart communication via generic raw uart and does not use traditional ttySxx devices node which are known to not provide enough low latency due to the tty overhead involved. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Describe the solution you'd like
Supporting again alterative Hardwares like HM-MOD UART attached via Silab CP2102.
https://github.com/ranseyer/homebrew-hw/blob/master/HMMOD-UART-CP2102/Photo.jpg
Describe alternatives you've considered
Buying new HW.
Is your feature request related to a problem?
Cheap HW like HMMOD-UART for Homematic is not usable.
You only need a old Livsi zentral, or... for getting the rf-module... and usb-converter and 4 wires.
I understand the picotek topic at older times. On the other side, the taken meassures are feeling like DRM for me.
Honestly i don't like Homematic IP, and also i don't like the form factor of Deimos-HW only for having "a little bit homematic classic" ...
So is it time to remove the deep hardware check ? (or am i wrong and its already removed ?)
Additional information
No response
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions