Would this be possible? Writing ``` { arr contains _ } ``` as an anonymous function just looks a lot more readable than: ``` { p => arr exists { _ == p } } ``` What do you think? Using such an anonymous function in a `filterNot` is quite handy the absence of support for `diff` on arrays.
Would this be possible? Writing
as an anonymous function just looks a lot more readable than:
What do you think?
Using such an anonymous function in a
filterNotis quite handy the absence of support fordiffon arrays.