Repository navigation
Replies: 1 comment
|
It depends on what the packaged
The upstream For fzf >= 0.48.0, upstream provides the integration through the binary; the documented zsh setup is: source <(fzf --zsh)Put it in the interactive-shell setup (normally For a packaging report, useful evidence would be: rpm -qf /usr/share/zsh/site-functions/_fzf
head -n 30 /usr/share/zsh/site-functions/_fzf
fzf --versionIf that file is actually upstream's initialization script, installed only as an autoloadable References: https://github.com/junegunn/fzf#setting-up-shell-integration and https://github.com/junegunn/fzf/blob/master/shell/completion.zsh Disclosure: AI-assisted answer, checked against upstream documentation and initialization code; I have not tested your RHEL package. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
This is more of a zsh question. In RHEL-based distros, completions for zsh are at
/usr/share/zsh/site-functions/_fzf. Is it appropriate if this file still needs to be sourced to get e.g.ssh **completion to work? files in /usr/share/zsh/site-functions are intended to work out of the box so not really appropriate for this_fzfthat needs to be sourced? Wondering if it's worth submitting an issue to the packager.All reactions