Repository navigation
Replies: 10 comments
|
Actually I want to know what situation belongs to "the acknowledged cumulatively"? |
|
Do you want this? https://pulsar.apache.org/docs/concepts-messaging#acknowledgement |
YES,i see the doc too . |
I don't see the ambiguity in this paragraph. It means the negative acknowledgment of messages can be performed either individually (in Shared and Key_Shared subscription types) or cumulatively (Exclusive and Failover subscription types). Did this answer your question? @startjava |
|
question1: why bottom is error: question2: i have 2 question |
|
You can try |
|
but i don't know what mean "negatively acknowledged cumulatively"。 |
You can understand it as "Cumulative NACK" - the negative acknowledgement is performed cumulatively, that is, consumers only negatively acknowledge the last message they receive. |
|
This is about knowledge sharing. Not an issue to resolve. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Search before asking
What issue do you find in Pulsar docs?
This website:
https://pulsar.apache.org/docs/concepts-messaging/#negative-acknowledgement
The:
Messages are negatively acknowledged individually or cumulatively, depending on the consumption subscription type.
The inner "opened indispensable cumulatively", does it have this function in pulsar? At least I did not find the corresponding API for this function.
I don't know if there is some ambiguity in the document, or if there is some problem with my understanding.
In addition:
In Exclusive and Failover subscription types, consumers only negatively acknowledge the last message they receive.
In Shared and Key_Shared subscription types, consumers can negatively acknowledge messages individually.
Are these two paragraphs necessary? In fact, it is the feature of four subscription types, namely whether there is one consumer or how many consumers, and it feels like adding these two paragraphs adds complexity to this technical point.
What is your suggestion?
?
Any reference?
No response
Are you willing to submit a PR?
All reactions